http://archive.autistics.org/library/autexpert.html
Vaxxed is actually looking at a possible link between, not neccessarily vaccines as a whole, but rather the MMR vacine and the age it is delivered and a range of health issues that appear to possibly be caused by THIS vacine, of which autism is only one.
The study is in fact by the CDC, was covered up by the CDC, was leaked by a member of the CDC, and the facts of this study should be public.
The massive media meltdown and abuse of this information in the movie, as well as the false facts the media is pushing out is curious. You could almost think that there was a reason this information must be covered up and no questions asked about the huge financial gain provided to certain companies by modern medicine.
"If you listen to the vaccine totalitarians and corporate science zealots, every person featured in VAXXED is a total quack, fraud or nut job who spouts loony gibberish that makes no sense.
If that's true, then why is this film too dangerous for anyone to watch? If the people interviewed in the film are obviously frauds and nut jobs, then why not let the entire world see the film and be even more convinced that they're full of bunk?
And, regarding
Dr Allan Wakefield, this is
NEVER EVER stated by those attacking Vaxxed...
Despite the fact that this
key public information totally destroys one of their only 'facts' against the film.....
"
Findings of the UK General Medical Council against the Wakefield et al. paper were overturned by the High Court, yet the Lancet still keeps that paper retracted – citing those overturned findings. Previous attempts have been made to persuade Lancet editor Richard Horton and the previous Lancet ombudsman Charles Warlow to restore “Ileal-Lymphoid-Nodular-Hyperplasia, Non-specific Colitis and Pervasive Developmental Disorder in Children” by Wakefield et al. Horton flatly refused, while Warlow denied having any responsibility for reconsidering the status of the paper.
Then in March, the Lancet hired Wisia Wedzicha – a new ombudsman to take Warlow’s place. In April, I contacted her asking that she repeal the retraction and restore Wakefield et al. Below is my email correspondence with her. Interestingly, she did acknowledge having responsibility for reconsidering the status of the paper, despite keeping it retracted for no given reason. She also made it clear that she did not want to hear about this matter again."
A few facts.
https://vaccinerisks.wordpress.com/2014/02/01/a-few-facts-about-dr-andrew-wakefield-and-his-paper/
13.1) Do you believe the MMR vaccine caused the autism.
A) Its not for me to say that. 8 of the parents have claimed that, and unfortunately we don’t know enough one way or the other. This aspect should be researched — in many cases in the past, its the parents observations that have been a starting point. And I believe in listening to parents. Both my parents are Doctors and we believe in listening to parents.
13.2) Have you given your children the MMR vaccine
A) Yes
13.3) In the light of what you have seen as part of the research, would you be vaccinating your children with the MMR vaccine.
A) Unfortunately no. But I would be separately vaccinating them with the Mumps, Rubella and the Measles vaccine at separate times. I think we should not be giving multiple vaccines at one go till we have fully researched the effects
That is it. All hell broke loose after that. Of the 13 Doctors, 10 were successfully pressurized to recant their name from the study paper. 3 Doctors, Dr AW , Dr Simon Murch and Dr John Walker Smith – the head of Royal Free at the time of research, refused, standing by their findings, and denying any wrongdoings. They were all stripped of their positions at the Royal Free.
Here is a review of the premier, try to watch it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZD79uALHs&ab_channel=WeAreChange
(Unlike most online 'reviews', this reviewer actually watched the movie...........)
KEY POINT, this is NOT an anti-vaccination film, in fact it supports single vaccinations at an appropriate age. It DOES point out scientific findings around the MMR vaccine and the age it is delivered.
You'll never get that information from the press hysteria demanding it's banning though.